|
Welcome to the Helix community web log. This a place where several like-minded college students rant about life.
Want to rant with us? Then become a member! And yes, when classes get busy there are few posts and even fewer updates. But you are welcome to change that. |
|
Check out the picture and quote of the week. |
Welcome 8:23 pm
miscAugust 29, 2005 8:23 pm
NEW! Space Shuttle Replacement
Look here: Return to the Apollo-esque launch vehicle
Looks like NASA’s decided to go back to the safer type of launch vehicle.
Thoughts?
(SSME = Space Shuttle Main Engine)
3 Comments »
The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://helix.blogsome.com/2005/08/29/new-space-shuttle-replacement/trackback/
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Hey, if it ain’t broken’ don’t fix it!
Comment by paladin — August 29, 2005 @ 8:49 pm
Back To Main Page
That’s just it - we’ve lost TWO (2) shuttles to minor oversights, and the last flight of Discovery was more or less a random chance of failure.
By eliminating the problem - the Shuttle’s flawed design by launch - it coulod go back to the Apollo success rate (the launch vehicle, that is) of 0 failures during launch.
Mind you, Apollo 1 failed (burned) due to an electrical failure in the command module. Apollo 13 failed due to an oxygen tank exploding in the command module. I see a connection here, but to the human-support systems. Apollo didn’t have those failures.
Of course, I could have competely misinterpeted what you said to mean the booster rocket idea rather than the shuttle :p
Comment by Ramius — August 29, 2005 @ 9:04 pm
Back To Main Page
Ok, it seems like we are on the same page. Rockets good, shuttles bad. Until we can find a more effecient form of proplosion, a reusable space vehicle is just not going to cut it.
Comment by paladin — August 30, 2005 @ 11:13 pm
Back To Main Page